Permutations with repetition and identical objects
So far we have arranged distinct objects with no repetition. Two important variants change the count.
Case 1: Repetition allowed
If we want a sequence of length from distinct items, with each position chosen independently (repetition allowed), then by the multiplication principle:
Example: -digit codes from digits – (repetition allowed): .
Case 2: Identical objects
If some of the objects are identical, then permutations that swap them are not really distinct. The corrected count is where are the multiplicities (how many of each kind), with .
This is the multinomial coefficient .
Derivation of the identical-objects formula
Suppose all objects were treated as distinct: total arrangements . Now collapse the objects of type 1: each true arrangement gets overcounted by (the orderings of those identical objects among themselves don't matter). Similarly for type 2, etc. Divide:
Case 3: Circular arrangements
When distinct objects are arranged in a circle (e.g. around a round table), only the relative positions matter , rotating the whole circle gives the same arrangement. So we fix one object and arrange the remaining :
If we also identify reflections (e.g. for a necklace), divide by : .
Worked examples
Example 1. How many license plates of three letters followed by four digits are there, with repetition allowed?
Letters: . Digits: . Total: .
Example 2. How many arrangements of the letters of the word MISSISSIPPI?
Letters: . Total letters: .
Example 3. How many ways can people sit around a round table?
Circular permutations: .
Example 4. How many words can be formed from the letters of BANANA so that the two 's are always together?
Glue as a block. Letters to arrange: , objects with 's repeating.
Example 5 (harder). How many ways can beads of different colours (e.g. red, green, blue) be strung in a circular necklace? (Reflections identified.)
If beads were distinguishable: .
With identical beads, we cannot simply divide by repetitions because rotation/reflection interact non-trivially with identical beads. The correct count uses Burnside's lemma, beyond Class-XI scope. In a typical Class-XI problem you would take the beads as distinguishable.
If the beads are distinguishable, the answer is .
If we just count distinct linear arrangements with identical beads: . Circular (without reflection): .
(Class XI problems typically stop at the simpler cases.)
Try it yourself
- How many -letter words can be formed from – with repetition allowed?
- How many distinct arrangements of the letters of LEVEL?
- How many distinct arrangements of STATISTICS?
- How many ways can persons sit around a round table?
- How many ways can men and women sit around a circular table, alternating?
- How many -digit even numbers with digits from – (repetition allowed)?
- How many arrangements of "PENCIL" have the two vowels together?
- How many distinct arrangements of "INDEPENDENCE"?
- How many garlands can be made from different flowers? (Circular with reflection.)
- How many three-letter strings using allow letter repetition?
- How many arrangements of "ALLAHABAD" have the vowels in odd places?
- Find the number of arrangements of in which appear in that relative order.
Pitfalls / Tricks
- For identical objects, divide by . Forgetting to do this multiplies your answer by a factorial.
- For circular permutations of distinct objects, the count is , not . The overcounts by a factor of (one rotation for each starting position).
- Necklaces vs round tables: necklaces identify reflections (divide by ), tables don't.
- Insight. Repetition allowed and identical objects are opposites: repetition allowed expands the count (to ), while identical objects contract it (divide by factorials). Apply the right one to your problem.