In earlier classes you used 23=8 and 24=16. You also met the rule 23⋅24=27. This lesson stretches those rules to real exponents, especially fractions like 21/2. Once that step is made, the symbol 2 becomes the same thing as 21/2 , and the whole machinery of exponents applies to surds for free.
Definitions
For a positive real base a and a positive integer n,
an=n timesa⋅a⋯a.
We extend this to:
Zero exponent:a0=1 (any non-zero base).
Negative exponent:a−n=an1.
Unit fraction exponent:a1/n=na, the positive n-th root of a (for a>0).
Rational exponent:am/n=(a1/n)m=(na)m=nam (the last equality is a useful identity).
Throughout this lesson a>0 unless otherwise stated; that avoids subtle issues with even roots of negative numbers.
The five laws
For any positive real a,b and any rational numbers p,q:
Product rule:ap⋅aq=ap+q.
Quotient rule:aqap=ap−q.
Power of a power:(ap)q=apq.
Power of a product:ap⋅bp=(ab)p.
Power of a quotient:bpap=(ba)p.
These are the same five rules you learned for integer exponents , now they hold for all rational exponents as well.
Why the rules extend smoothly. Take rule 1 with p=21,q=21. The rule predicts a1/2⋅a1/2=a1=a. The geometric truth is a⋅a=a. The two agree , and demanding all five rules continue to hold is exactly what forces the definition a1/2=a. The definition is not arbitrary; it is the unique extension that keeps the algebra consistent.
A consistency check. Rule 3 with p=2,q=21 predicts (a2)1/2=a1=a. That matches a2=a (since a>0). Good. Rule 3 with p=21,q=21 predicts (a1/2)1/2=a1/4. That matches 4a=a. Good.
Using the laws on surds. Because a=a1/2, statements about surds reduce to statements about exponents. For instance,
a⋅b=a1/2⋅b1/2=(ab)1/2=ab.
This is the reason for the product rule of surds you used in the last lesson.
Cube roots and higher.a1/3=3a is the unique real n-th root of a for a>0. So 81/3=2 and 272/3=(271/3)2=32=9. Negative bases need care: (−1)1/2 is not real, but (−1)1/3=−1 is.
Real (irrational) exponents. The same rules continue to hold even when p,q are irrational, like 2π. We will not prove this here, but the idea is that 2π is the limit of 2r for rational r's approaching π. This is why expressions like πe make sense.
Worked examples
Example 1. Simplify 23⋅25.
Product rule: 23⋅25=23+5=28=256.
Example 2. Simplify 3538.
Quotient rule: 38−5=33=27.
Example 3. Simplify 51/2⋅51/4.
Product rule: 51/2+1/4=53/4=(53)1/4=1251/4=4125.
Example 4. Evaluate (12527)2/3.
Quotient rule and power of a quotient: =1252/3272/3=(53)2/3(33)2/3=5232=259.
Example 5. Simplify a1/6a1/2⋅a2/3.
Product rule on top: a1/2+2/3=a7/6. Quotient rule: a7/6−1/6=a6/6=a.
Try it yourself
Simplify 21/2⋅23/2.
Evaluate 163/4.
Simplify 71/5⋅74/5.
Simplify (82/3)−1/2.
Simplify 51/253/2.
Evaluate (64)−1/3.
Show that 627=3 using the laws of exponents.
Simplify (8116)1/4.
Simplify a−1/3a1/2 in the form a□.
If 9x=27, find x.
Pitfalls / Insight
Bases must match for product/quotient rules.23⋅34 does not combine into one power.
Negative exponent is reciprocal, not negative number.2−3=81, not −8.
For real-exponent rules, keep a>0. Things like (−4)1/2 are not real numbers and break the laws.
Insight. The phrase "law of exponents" is just rule 1, used five times in slightly different disguises. If you remember ap⋅aq=ap+q, you can re-derive every other rule by writing things in terms of products and reciprocals. So practise that one rule until it is automatic , the rest follow.