Mathematicians (and exam papers) like fractions whose denominators are rational. A denominator like 2 or 2+1 is technically fine but awkward , you cannot easily compare 2+11 with 3−11, and adding such fractions is a chore. Rationalisation is the technique that scrubs surds out of the denominator using one short trick: multiply by a clever form of 1.
Definitions
The conjugate of a binomial surd a+b is a−b. The conjugate of a+b is a−b. The conjugate of a−b is a+b. In every case, multiplying a binomial surd by its conjugate gives a difference of squares with no surd left:
(a+b)(a−b)=a−b,(a+b)(a−b)=a2−b.
To rationalise a fraction is to rewrite it as an equivalent fraction whose denominator contains no surd.
Concept and technique
Single-term surd in the denominator. Multiply numerator and denominator by the same surd:
21=21⋅22=22.
The result is exact: 21 and 22 are the same number. We have only multiplied by 1.
Binomial surd in the denominator. Multiply by the conjugate:
2+11=2+11⋅2−12−1=(2)2−122−1=12−1=2−1.
That same trick works for 3−21: multiply by 3+23+2 to get 3−23+2=3+2.
General form. For a fraction a+bcN (with N any expression and a,b,c rationals, c≥0), multiply top and bottom by a−bc. The new denominator is a2−b2c, which is rational. The new numerator might still contain surds, but that is exactly the goal: shift them upstairs.
Why we do it. Three big reasons.
Comparison.2+11 rationalised becomes 2−1≈0.414. Now it is obvious it is less than 1.
Addition. Adding 21 and 31 is messy. Rationalise to 22 and 33, then a common denominator of 6 does it.
Standard form. A "neat" answer in board exams is one with no surd in the denominator.
The trick is the difference of squares. Every rationalisation in this lesson is just (a+b)(a−b)=a2−b2 applied to surds. If you remember that identity, the technique is automatic.
For cube roots and higher, conjugates are more elaborate. To rationalise 3a1, multiply by 3a23a2 to get a3a2. We focus on square roots here.
Worked examples
Example 1. Rationalise the denominator of 71.
Multiply by 77: 71=77.
Example 2. Rationalise 2+31.
Multiply by 2−32−3: numerator =2−3, denominator =4−3=1. So the answer is 2−3.
Example 3. Rationalise 5−25.
Multiply by 5+25+2: numerator =5(5+2), denominator =5−2=3. Answer: 35(5+2).
Example 4. Simplify 3+21+3−21.
Combine over a common denominator: (3+2)(3−2)(3−2)+(3+2)=9−26=76. Notice how the conjugate pair in the denominator did the rationalisation automatically.
Example 5. If 5−21=a+b5, find a and b.
Rationalise: 5−21⋅5+25+2=5−45+2=5+2. So a=2,b=1.
Try it yourself
Rationalise 111.
Rationalise 7−61.
Rationalise 5+21.
Simplify 2+34.
Rationalise 3−26.
Show that 2+31+2−31 is rational.
If 7−57+5−7+57−5=a+b5, find a and b.
Rationalise 2−11−2+11.
Simplify 6−33.
If x=3−21, find x2 in rationalised form.
Pitfalls / Insight
Conjugates flip only the sign between the two surd terms. The conjugate of 3+2 is 3−2, not −3+2. (Both work mathematically here, but the standard convention is the first.)
Don't change the value. You multiply by cc where c is non-zero. If c=0, your "trick" was illegal because you cannot multiply by 0/0.
Simplify after rationalising.612 should be written 612=623=33.
Insight. When you encounter a+bc anywhere, imagine its conjugate a−bc next to it. Together they kill the surd via a2−b2c. This is the only idea in the lesson. Everything else is bookkeeping.